I recognize that health emergencies, surgery, and life-saving procedures are very sexy, engaging, and generally fascinating. Tales of citizens of the U.S. who cannot afford chemotherapy or surgery, or who get turned back from emergency rooms rightly set people's blood to boiling.

I wish, though, that discussions of health care, and in particular, socialized health care would pay some attention to the less glamorous, less dramatic advantages of providing health care to citizens: the health part:
  • Annual checkups and tests, so that you have a baseline from which to track changes to your body
  • The ability to visit a doctor and have an ailment diagnosed and treated before it becomes life-threatening and warrants a hospital stay
  • Hassle-free sexual health exams and counselling
  • Pre-natal and neo-natal treatment for moms and babies
  • Adequate follow-up from surgical procedures and emergencies
In a lifetime of living in a country with socialized medicine, I've visited the ER possibly a double handful of times (stitches when I was eight; a broken arm when I was 9 or 10; a few rounds of dangerous dehydration and distraught boyfriend when I got sick in university; stitches after a bike accident when I was 21; a large first-degree burn (with some second) when I was in my mid-20s). I've had minor surgery three times (to remove a chelazian from my eyelid when I was 7; to remove my tonsils when I was 11; and to marsupialize a cyst when I was in my mid-20s). I've never had any serious surgery or a stay in a hospital longer than one night. I'm a healthcare lightweight.

But I'm in the system! Boy, am I in the system! )
zingerella: Capital letter "Z" decorated with twining blue and purple vegetation (Default)
( Jul. 21st, 2009 11:50 am)
The Weatherill report on the causes of and factor influencing last year's Listeriosis outbreak (the one that resulted in the deaths of 20 people) was leaked to CTV last night. Impolitical has picked up on several really bad decisions, and gives cogent explanations of why they're bad.

In a nutshell, the Harper government, and Harper appointeees
  • reduced the reporting requirements, stating that facilities need only report problems likely to cause public health concerns, and removed the Canada Food Inspection Agency's responsibility for overseeing cleanup at any facilities that reported positive bacteria tests.
  • got rid of any representation for the Public Health Agency of Canada at the Cabinet level, so that public health concerns were subsumed in the Ministry of Health portfolio
  • more or less killed CFIA as an inspecting body, relegating it to a supervisory role. What would CFIA be supervising? The inspections performed and reported on by a "self-regulating" industry
Want to ask the 20 dead people and their families how smaller government and industry self-regulation is working for them?

Dear Mr. Harper, you ghastly idealogue ... )
.